could he be in control of what's happening?
It's certainly weird for Strange to be handing out advice like that when he messed up the spell. Strange tells Parker that we know frighteningly little about the multiverse and that the longer Parker continues to try and live two lives, his life will only become more dangerous. Towards the end of the Spider-Man: No Way Home trailer, Doctor Strange hits Peter Parker with a firm admonishment. Is Doctor Strange Just Teaching Peter A Lesson? I wouldn't have trouble believing her investigation and actions created some problems in the magical world, which Marvel Comics has shown to be very volatile when there isn't balance. Specifically, I'm thinking about how Wanda Maximoff tapped into chaos magic in WandaVision and was investigating it further at the end of the series. Let's also not forget the MCU TV shows on Disney+, all of which may precede or be happening simultaneously to the events of Spider-Man: No Way Home. Or it's possible there is more at play than just Peter's interference in the spell, just because I can't see that being the sole cause. Perhaps this magical imbalance is the key to the spell failing and not Peter's random suggestions in the midst of the spell creation. I'll add that if the snow problem was easily rectified, then Doctor Strange wouldn't be wearing a winter coat like we see him sporting when Peter arrives. I'm speculating there's something off with the magical world, given that it's a winter wonderland in Sanctum Sanctorum. Of course, we're making assumptions here, as we don't know for sure that Wong suggested Strange was incapable of such a spell.
Stephen Strange didn't get in the position he's in being an average sorcerer, so I can understand why Strange may have felt a bit disrespected by the admonishment. As mentioned, Wong ( who will also appear in Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings) deliberately warned Doctor Strange in the Spider-Man: No Way Home trailer not to perform the spell, adding that it was "too dangerous." No disrespect to Wong, but let's remember who he's talking to.
0 kommentar(er)
